Thickets Video Contest

Mario had an idea for a music video contest for the Thickets. Here’s my first draft for the writeup/rules. Feedback welcome.

Hey kids! Do you have a film school project coming up? Are you an indie filmmaker looking to expand your portfolio? Or do you just have a cell phone camera, a lot of hard drive space, and a jonesin’ for all things Lovecraftian? Introducing the very first music video contest for the H.P. Lovecraft inspired punk band, The Darkest of the Hillside Thickets.

Our next CD release will include a DVD, and we want your work to be on it! There are very few restrictions, and here they are:

1. You must give us permission in writing that we are allowed to use your film for our DVD and promo purposes (such as youtube).
2. You must use a complete song from any of our albums.
3. No porn, misogyny, or general bad taste in subject matter. Fake gore in good humour is a-ok!
4. Must not contain any elements to which you do not have the rights (don’t use Star Wars, Mickey Mouse, or Hellboy in the video, for starters). This includes any sound or images you don’t own, (unless they’re public domain or covered by a creative commons license). No pilfered film footage, that includes other music, identifiable products or logos (no sports team jersies or coke cans).

You own the rights to your film. You can submit it to film festivals (such as the H.P. Lovecraft Film Festival, Screamfest, and A Night of Horror), make your own DVDs, whatever you like. As long as The Darkest of the Hillside Thickets are credited with the music, we’re not going try to restrict use of your film.

It can be live action, a Flash cartoon, stop-motion animation, anything you like.

We, the band, will review all of the submissions and pick a video which will receive the Tentacule d’Or award. This recipient will receive $200 in Thickets merchandise of their choice. Even those who don’t win the contest are still eligible to have the film on the Thickets DVD. All qualifying films will get a copy of the album/DVD.

Bonus considerations for the Tentacule d’Or are as follows:
a) Use of tentacles in the video.
b) Giant monsters destroying cities.
c) Setting in the deep sea or in outer space.
d) Use of the Necronomicon.
e) Using any of the following songs: Blackout; No Way; Strange; Return to Melanesia; Cultists on Board; A Need-To-Know Basis; Operation: Get the Hell Out Of Here; Ride the Flying Polyp; Downtown (In the Cenozoic); Nyarlathotep; 20 Minutes of Oxygen; The Innsmouth Look; Power Up; Frogstar; The Math Song; Dies Is Unverschamtheit; The Chosen One; Slave Ship; KABLAM!; Big Robot Dinosaur; Goin’ Down To Dunwich; Yig Snake Daddy; Hookworm; Rock Lords; Protein; Burrow Your Way To My Heart

Full credit will be given to you on the DVD of course, including the website of your choice. We will even help you out in any way that we can while you make your video. We can probably send you some photos and other footage if you need it, and we’ll answer whatever questions you pose. If you live near Vancouver BC, Seattle WA or Portland OR you’ll have some opportunities to take live footage of the band.

-Phase One will be your proposal submission. Let us know what song you’d like to do, what the theme and subject matter will be, what media you’ll be using, and all of that. Deadline for proposal is Oct 1 2008.
-Phase Two will be the final product! Deadline for final product will be June 28 2009. Extensions can be requested but no guarantees. It’s even better if you can provide updates of your progress. Why not make a blog about the project, or at least email us with your updates and we’ll spread the word amongst Thicketdom to keep the interest and excitement at peak levels AT ALL TIMES. Maybe our vast network of Cthulhoids can put you on your way to wealth and infamy.

Format: Mini-DV, DVD, or Quicktime, in either HD or NTSC (the North American video standard). Videos shot in PAL (the European format) can be converted, but it’s a pain in the nippers so best avoided.

Gugs and fishes,
Toren Atkinson
thickets@uniserve.com
604.737.4283
3254 West 3rd Ave Vancouver BC V6K1N4

Casting Call of Cthulhu

Here’s a great little Lovecraftian short that is sure to be playing at the HPL Film Fest this year, and take special notes of the music over the credits!

The Beast With A Billion Backs

In case you didn’t know the new Futurama direct to DVD movie is out tomorrow. I’ve seen it and it’s about as good as the last one. Maybe not quite. But the great news is that there is a preview for the next one, “Bender’s Game,” and it looks pretty much like a feature length D&D send-up. I’m all over that like a nerd on a fiendish dire smartie.

Spellfighter

Chris Pramas crystallizes one of the things that bothered me about D&D 4th Edition but I couldn’t place.

No Newb Class: In every previous edition of D&D there has been at least one easy-to-play class that you could start people off with, fighter being the classic choice. 4E gives an equal number of powers to all classes, which means that playing any of them is like running a spellcaster in previous editions [emphasis mine]. There are at least some suggested builds for each class, so that’s something but playing a 4E character for the first time still requires a more decision making than I think is advisable for new gamers.

2008 PAX/HPLFF Thickets Tour shirts

Here’s my first pass at the long sleeve tour shirt for PAX and the H.P. Lovecraft Film Festival. Did I miss any hilarious opportunities to throw in some Lovecraftian references? Suggestions welcome!

Truncheons and Flagons 4E

In the past three days I’ve played 3.5 edition D&D (granted with tons of home rules), Savage Worlds and 4th edition D&D.

D&D has never been my favourite roleplaying game. When I first started playing D&D in 9th grade, I immediately started writing my own rules system (Power Enterprise). I don’t pretend my teenage d30 system is any better than D&D rules in any of it’s various incarnations, but it wasn’t the fact that someone else owned the rights to the D&D game rules that made me want to make my own.

I have played D&D more than any other game system for the following reasons:

It has decades of resources numbering in the thousands, more if you include miniatures (which I seem to collect).
It’s far and away easier to find people who know how to play and are interested in D&D than any other system.
I do enjoy the tolkeinesque genre and there’s something to be said for nostagia.

I’m reasonably intimate with the rules of 3.0/3.5 D&D not because I’ve studied them intensively, but because I’ve been playing it for 8 years. Fourth edition has many changed/altered/streamlined/new rules from the previous version but it is still very much Dungeons and Dragons. If you don’t like the previous D&D rules, then this is bad news. If you like the previous D&D rules – any of them really – then this is good news. They are still convoluted, require lots of math, are made for cheaters, and are legion. Fourth edition D&D doesn’t seem to have any less bookkeeping than previous versions. I only played one game, and since I was a player I can’t comment on the claims that it’s much easier to DM. From my perspective, combat isn’t any quicker. The character who is attacking an orc will still take 5 minutes and the character who is lighting the lantern will still take 5 seconds.

Speaking of Astronomy

View this as a slide show – click on the first image and then hover your mouse around the right edge of the pic that pops up to move to the next one.

Ironic Man

Thanks to Devon, I got to see Iron Man on Wednesday. Now that everyone’s had a chance to see it I can dissect with impunity.

First, there were definitely things I liked about Iron Man. I liked the Tony Stark character overall and I was pleasantly surprised by Downey Jr’s acting. The building and testing of the second generation suit segment was fun and entertaining. I also really appreciated that they folded the original 1960’s Iron Man cartoon theme music into the soundtrack. Nerd gem, that.

The second half of the movie is predicated on the rather silly construct, if you will, of this jury-rigged bullet deflecting suit of armor that our hero made in the caves in Afghanistan*. You can’t really get around that with a movie about a suit of power armor, so I’m willing to forgive that convention.

Gwyneth Paltrow seemed completely out of her element. I get the sense that she just didn’t get her character or the movie or both. Everything about her and her relationship with Stark was completely awkward and I wanted it to go away. The whole sequence of her being chased by Stane and being a damsel in distress over a cell phone was B.A.D.

With regards to Jeff Bridges as Stane – I appreciated the moxie of this casting. I really wanted it to work but by the end of the film, it didn’t. They took a good, smart, interesting character (though I would have liked to have had some more background and character development on this Stane fellow) and stripped him down to a one-dimensional idiot in a giant robot suit by the end of the film. They pitch-shifted his voice down to a suitably evil level and he transitioned from a realistic threat to a cartoony super villain. Now I know what you’re thinking: “Toren, how can you fault a movie for being cartoony when it’s based on what is essentially a cartoon?” Well, dear reader, the fault lies in trying to treat your subject matter with a serious, realistic tone, and then hamstringing that tone with cartooniness. Mixing the two is a delicate dance that few can pull off.

I don’t even know what to say about the final battle. It wasn’t anything to write home about and it was surprisingly short. Except for the part where Iron Man was hanging on to the skylight frame and yelling at Pepper…that was not short at all. And did I miss something that explained how Pepper survived the falling glass AND the huge explosion from the reactor right beside her?

Obadiah Stane’s remark about how in trying to nullify the world’s weapons Stark ironically created the world’s most dangerous one pretty much sums up the problem with the movie. It seemed on the verge of addressing some compelling issues and then brushed them aside for a CGI melee. Stane et al said that Stark came back a changed man after his experience in Afghanistan. It was alluded to that he was mad. He certainly came across as a nut asking the press to sit on the floor while he chowed down on Burger King. I liked where that was going and I wanted to see more. Here is a guy that obviously has an inner conflict and a lot of baggage and he deals with them in a way that no one could call sane – by building a suit of power armor for himself – but the movie approaches it as if it’s the logical route (rather than, say, using his fiscal power to make policy changes – I know, boring subject for a movie but that’s the other extreme here, and something in the middle could have been just as entertaining), and that he’s a good man with a heart who is doing the right thing. Down with the crazy Afghan warmongers and up with the crazy American warmongers, rah rah rah. The story would flip flop from serious to frivolous – from helpless villagers being separated from their families and executed to cartoony robot battles – so that I simply became confused about what the movie was about. My best guess is “unaddressed post traumatic stress disorder + unlimited cash = flying killing vengeance machine.”

The bottom line is that making a realistic, faithful Iron Man adaptation set in today’s world is an enormous task. Hats off for trying, I say. I can’t think of how I would go about making a better script but just because the job is impossible doesn’t make the final product any less lackluster. So that’s why I only gave it 5/10. Yes, I would probably see a sequel and yes, I am looking forward to The Incredible Hulk, although I am expecting it will suffer the same pitfalls.

*Why the weapons demo that preluded the sequence couldn’t be done in a safe US military proving ground zone isn’t addressed.